On Indian roads, the colour red does not always mean stop.
At many intersections, a red light is treated as a
suggestion—something to be negotiated, timed, or quietly ignored. Signal
jumping has become so common that those who actually stop often feel foolish.
This behaviour is not accidental. It is learned, repeated,
and normalised.
The Data Behind Signal Jumping
Let’s begin with the numbers.
- According
to Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH) data, signal
jumping and related violations contribute significantly to intersection-related
accidents, which form a major share of urban road crashes.
- Urban
intersections account for a disproportionately high number of fatal
accidents, despite lower speeds compared to highways.
- Studies
by traffic police departments in major cities have repeatedly shown that red-light
violations peak during non-peak hours, when drivers believe
enforcement is low.
Signal jumping is not about urgency. It is about
opportunity.
“Just One Vehicle” Syndrome
Most signal jumpers do not see themselves as reckless.
They tell themselves:
- “Just
one vehicle, nothing will happen.”
- “The
other side is empty.”
- “I’ll
clear before green.”
But traffic systems do not collapse because of one person.
They collapse because everyone thinks they are the exception.
When multiple drivers jump signals, cross traffic loses
predictability—and collisions become inevitable.
Why Red Lights Feel Optional in India
Several factors weaken respect for signals:
- Poor
signal timing and long waits
- Lack
of countdown timers
- Inconsistent
enforcement
- Cultural
tolerance for rule-breaking
When rules feel inconvenient and consequences feel unlikely,
compliance disappears.
The result is a system where obedience is mocked and
violation is rewarded with saved time.
The Myth of Time-Saving
Let’s address the biggest misconception.
Signal jumping does not save meaningful time.
At best, it saves a few seconds. At worst, it causes:
- Accidents
- Traffic
pile-ups
- Ambulance
delays
- Legal
consequences
A single crash at an intersection can block traffic for
hours—far outweighing any perceived benefit.
Time saved individually is time stolen collectively.
The Impact on Pedestrians and Cyclists
Signal jumping affects not just vehicles.
Pedestrians crossing on green often face vehicles rushing
through red. Cyclists, already vulnerable, are forced to brake or swerve.
This creates fear and hesitation, making crossings chaotic
and unsafe.
A signal that protects only vehicles is not a safety
system—it is a liability.
Cameras, Fines, and Their Limits
Many cities have installed red-light cameras and increased
fines. While violations drop temporarily, behaviour often returns once
enforcement weakens.
Why?
Because fear-based compliance does not last. Behavioural
change requires:
- Predictable
enforcement
- Fair
signal design
- Social
disapproval of violations
Without these, fines become just another cost of driving.
When Discipline Becomes Social, Not Legal
In disciplined traffic systems, drivers stop at red lights
even when roads are empty.
Not because of fear—but because of habit and social
expectation.
In India, the opposite is often true. Stopping alone feels
awkward. Moving together feels normal.
This social inversion is what truly needs fixing.
A Simple Test of Discipline
The next time you approach a red signal late at night, ask
yourself:
Would I still stop if no one was watching?
That answer reveals more about road discipline than any
fine.
Final Thought
Red lights are not barriers.
They are agreements.
Breaking them is not clever driving—it is breaking trust
with everyone else on the road.
No comments:
Post a Comment